Application of Risks Scores in Acute Coronary Syndromes. How Does ProACS Hold Up Against Other Risks Scores?

BACKGROUND: Multiple risk scores (RS) are approved in the prediction of worse prognosis in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Recently, the Portuguese Journal of Cardiology has proposed the ProACS RS. OBJECTIVE: Application of several validated RS, as well as ProACS in patients, admitted for ACS. Evaluation of each RS's performance in predicting in-hospital mortality and the occurrence of all-cause mortality or non-fatal ACS at one-year follow-up and compare them to the ProACS RS. METHODS: A retrospective study of ACS was performed. The following RS were applied: GRACE, ACTION Registry-GWTG, PURSUIT, TIMI, EMMACE, SRI, CHA2DS2-VASc-HS, C-ACS and ProACS. ROC Curves were created to determine the predictive power for each RS and then were directly compared to ProACS. RESULTS: The ProACS, ACTION Registry-GWTG and GRACE showed a c-statistics of 0.908, 0.904 and 0.890 for predicting in-hospital mortality, respectively, performing better in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. The other RS performed satisfactorily, with c-statistics over 0.750, apart from the CHA2DS2-VASc-HS and C-ACS which underperformed. All RS underperformed in predicting worse long-term prognosis revealing c-statistics under 0.700. CONCLUSION: ProACS is an easily obtained risk score for early stratification of in-hospital mortality. When evaluating all RS, the ProACS, ACTION Registry-GWTG and GRACE RS showed the best performance, demonstrating high capability of predicting a worse prognosis. ProACS was able to demonstrate statistically significant superiority when compared to almost all RS. Thus, the ProACS has showed that it is able to combine simplicity in the calculation of the score with good performance in predicting a worse prognosis.

Application of Risks Scores in Acute Coronary Syndromes. How Does ProACS Hold Up Against Other Risks Scores? / Aplicação de Escores de Risco em Síndromes Coronárias Agudas: Como o ProACS se Comporta Diante de Outros Escores de Risco?

Abstract Background: Multiple risk scores (RS) are approved in the prediction of worse prognosis in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Recently, the Portuguese Journal of Cardiology has proposed the ProACS RS. Objective: Application of several validated RS, as well as ProACS in patients, admitted for ACS. Evaluation of each RS's performance in predicting in-hospital mortality and the occurrence of all-cause mortality or non-fatal ACS at one-year follow-up and compare them to the ProACS RS. Methods: A retrospective study of ACS was performed. The following RS were applied: GRACE, ACTION Registry-GWTG, PURSUIT, TIMI, EMMACE, SRI, CHA2DS2-VASc-HS, C-ACS and ProACS. ROC Curves were created to determine the predictive power for each RS and then were directly compared to ProACS. Results: The ProACS, ACTION Registry-GWTG and GRACE showed a c-statistics of 0.908, 0.904 and 0.890 for predicting in-hospital mortality, respectively, performing better in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. The other RS performed satisfactorily, with c-statistics over 0.750, apart from the CHA2DS2-VASc-HS and C-ACS which underperformed. All RS underperformed in predicting worse long-term prognosis revealing c-statistics under 0.700. Conclusion: ProACS is an easily obtained risk score for early stratification of in-hospital mortality. When evaluating all RS, the ProACS, ACTION Registry-GWTG and GRACE RS showed the best performance, demonstrating high capability of predicting a worse prognosis. ProACS was able to demonstrate statistically significant superiority when compared to almost all RS. Thus, the ProACS has showed that it is able to combine simplicity in the calculation of the score with good performance in predicting a worse prognosis.

Resumo Fundamento: Existem muitos escores de risco (ERs) aprovados na predição de um pior prognóstico em síndromes coronárias agudas (SCAs). Recentemente, a Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia propôs o ER ProACS. Objetivo: Aplicar vários ERs validados, bem como o ProACS em pacientes internados por SCA. Avaliar o desempenho de cada ER em predizer mortalidade hospitalar e a ocorrência de mortalidade por todas as causas ou SCA não fatal em um ano de acompanhamento e compará-los com o ProACS. Métodos: Estudo retrospectivo de SCA. Os seguintes ERs foram aplicados: GRACE, ACTION Registry-GWTG, PURSUIT, TIMI, EMMACE, SRI, CHA2DS2-VASc-HS, C-ACS e ProACS. Curvas ROC foram criadas para determinar o poder preditivo de cada ER e diretamente comparadas com a do ProACS. Resultados: Os escores ProACS, ACTION Registry-GWTG e GRACE mostraram estatística-C de 0,908, 0,904 e 0,890, respectivamente, em predizer mortalidade hospitalar, mostrando melhor desempenho em pacientes com infarto do miocárdio com elevação do segmento ST. Os demais ERs mostraram desempenho satisfatório, com estatística-C acima de 0,750, com exceção de CHA2DS2-VASc-HS e C-ACS, que mostraram baixa performance. Todos os ERs apresentaram baixo desempenho em predizer um pior prognóstico em longo prazo, com estatística-C abaixo de 0,700. Conclusão: O ProACS é um escore de risco facilmente obtido para estratificação precoce de mortalidade intra-hospitalar. Ao avaliar todos os ERs, ProACS, ACTION Registry-GWTG e GRACE mostraram o melhor desempenho, com alta capacidade de predizer um pior prognóstico. O ProACS mostrou superioridade estatisticamente significativa em comparação aos outros ERs. Portanto, o ProACS mostrou-se capaz de combinar simplicidade no cálculo do escore com bom desempenho em predizer um pior prognóstico.

[Twiddler syndrome: rare cause of definitive pacemaker dysfunction]. / Síndrome de Twiddler: Causa Rara de Disfunção de Pacemaker Definitivo.

The authors present a case of Twiddler's syndrome, a rare complication after pacemaker implantation, first described in 1968. The article is complemented by an approach to the etiology and manifestations of this entity.

Os autores apresentam um caso de síndrome de Twiddler, uma complicação rara após implantação de pacemaker definitivo, primeiramente descrito em 1968, complementado com uma abordagem à etiologia e manifestações desta entidade.

Spontaneous fluctuations between diagnostic and nondiagnostic ECGs in Brugada syndrome screening: Portuguese family with Brugada syndrome.

BACKGROUND: All family members of patients with Brugada syndrome (BS) should be screened. Fluctuations between diagnostic and nondiagnostic electrocardiogram (ECG) patterns in patients with BS are recognized, but systematic studies are lacking. The objective of this work was to prospectively evaluate the spontaneous changes between diagnostic and nondiagnostic ECG patterns in a family screened for BS. METHODS: One hundred twenty-nine family members were possibly affected plus the index case were screened with two ECGs with an interval of 6 months. Only coved-type ECG pattern was defined as diagnostic; type 2 and 3 ECGs were considered suggestive. RESULTS: The first ECG series made six diagnostics and the second 11, but only three patients maintained the diagnostic ECG. Patients with basal diagnostic ECG were older and more frequently symptomatic. Body mass index (BMI) was significantly lower in adults with diagnostic plus suggestive ECG when compared with the others. No significant gender difference was found among relatives with or without diagnostic ECG. CONCLUSION: Spontaneous phenotypic manifestation of BS was more frequent in older symptomatic patients, absent in children, and related with low BMI. ECG manifestations were intermittent in more than 3/4 of the affected patients. Fluctuations between diagnostic and nondiagnostic ECGs may have an implication on the correct phenotyping in family screening so several ECGs with drug challenging are mandatory.